Now that I have a few kits under my belt, I'm starting to be able to compare kits and details between each other. I recently picked this kit up from Amazon and is next on the "bench". This kit wasn't what I had in mind a month ago, and due to dragging my feet a bit, Amazon no longer carries the kit I wanted directly. I have to buy it from a shipper and pay out the nose in shipping. I'll wait on that kit and see how it comes out. I've never done a Japanese aircraft before, so we'll see how it goes. In the meantime here is the review.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9fe9/c9fe9f988937843c1992d799213ae7caf95bbd3b" alt="Review" |
Here is the box. So pretty. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0fe9f/0fe9f1fa8a3de29432e02569b70294bae0992294" alt="Review" |
There are a total of four sprues. Definitely not too many parts to keep a track of. The instructions have a copyright of 1982. I really don't think the detail is up to today's standards anymore. The detail on the exterior is "soft". I'm not sure I can explain what that means at the moment.You'll just have to deal with that. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cf14/9cf146116b40bb20059d16ae57a87c7521f9284b" alt="Review" |
The wings as well as the fuselage have a mix of recessed and raised panel lines. I really hate raised panel lines. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2017f/2017f44a7c3856c273f865bf7dbee0591e4d3d16" alt="Review" |
The "second" sprue is the lower wing assembly. The bottom of the wings are one piece, similar to Tamiya's Mk. I Spitfire. Again, the details are soft and a mix of recessed and raised detail. The wheel well detail is rather nice. The plastic on the wings and fuselage seems pretty thin. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c44e/4c44e813e3367057e93d07584e5d948f7811d5bf" alt="Review" |
The "third" sprue. You get seven different dudes. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/638fc/638fc829f52c1a9e57f41c1be1c75e4dffcfc73a" alt="Review" |
The pistons that forms the engine. Nicely detailed, albeit plain with a pesky seam line running around the circumference on outside on top of the detail. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad138/ad138d6f6ecaaf2dccab7997a68d771809bbf6d8" alt="Review" |
The struts are pretty nicely detailed although, there are seam lines and ejector pin marks (EPM's) in hard to reach areas. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55c8d/55c8d8229948c3296a6711e85285e83a27f9ac56" alt="Review" |
The engine cowl. I think it was part of a sprue, but was floating around like an orphan. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2dd9/d2dd9362f8caec9d299777c1b4483f5a7ee95356" alt="Review" |
The "fourth" sprue. You have two canopy options, open or closed. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9a48/f9a48678962dbfe646333fcfe69fb072c8fd537d" alt="Review" |
Tamiya decals. Pretty standard here. A bit thick. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9a3b/a9a3bb00d831bc0466cf28aa65c229512d39d7ab" alt="" |
As far as instructions go, this is it. One fold out, pretty straight forward. I think I'll pretty much not be following it. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c2cf/7c2cf701ac59cefff9d19931116872c18500233a" alt="Review" |
You get a few different options for markings. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba692/ba69286c5f1b48daaadf20e44bf7bace941c7684" alt="Review" |
Some measurements for you. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0259/f0259bcc9b3bb244eec0d424137207309bf695de" alt="Review" |
When completed, I think it will be a tad smaller than the Spitfire. |
That's it. Overall, I would say this kit is not too bad. We'll check the fit when it's being built. Tamiya typically hasn't been a problem in the past. Details are a bit of a disappointment with raised and recessed panel lines. Some EPM's in hard to reach areas, but good quality for the most part. What's "quality" you ask? You must have taken a project management course.
No comments:
Post a Comment